What is Independent Mortgage Advisors

Independent Mortgage Advisors same as Independent Financial Advisers or IFAs are professionals who offer independent advice on financial matters and recommend suitable financial products from the whole of the market. (Now, need advice for mortgage restructuring or loan modification; For USA Financial Crisis can apply from UK for help home owner and help jobless in financial industry)

The term was developed to reflect a UK regulatory position and has a specific UK meaning, although it has been adopted in other parts of the world.

The term "Independent Financial Adviser" was coined to describe the advisers working independently for their clients rather than representing an insurance company, bank or bancassurer. At the time (1988) the UK government was introducing the polarisation regime which forced advisers to either be tied to a single insurer or product provider or to be an independent practitioner. The term is commonly used in the United Kingdom where IFAs are regulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and must meet strict qualification and competence requirements.

In the UK the industry has been de-polarised since 2005. There are now three main classes of adviser: tied advisers (working for one financial institution), multi-tied advisers (offering products from a selection of the market and usually paid on a commission basis) and independent financial advisers. Independent financial advisers must offer their clients the option to pay for advice by fee as an alternative to commission.

Paying for advice

To encourage client's awareness of the cost of advice, and to stimulate a market in advice, the FSA has introduced a new disclosure regime for advisers giving regulated investment advice. Since July 2005 this regime insists that advisers who market themselves as independent must offer the option of paying a fee for advice. The three main remuneration options available are as follows:

• Commission: Traditionally the most common way to pay for advice is for the IFA to receive a commission from the product provider. The amount of commission must be disclosed, and some IFAs will rebate a portion of their commission, particularly in Execution-Only cases. The amount of commission and whether it is deducted from the amount you actually invest or is included in the cost of the investment varies from product to product. The client pays for commission from product charges so it does not represent 'free advice'. As well as the initial commission, the adviser is likely to be also paid an annual "trail" commission by the product provider. Not all products offer the same rate of trail commission and therefore a potential conflict of interest may arise. The products making the highest management charges usually offer the adviser the highest trail commission.
• Fees: Less common than commission, all IFAs must offer the option of working for a fee. Depending on the size and type of the investment, and the complexity of the advice, this can work out cheaper than paying commission. Paying a fee for advice is the best way to ensure that the advice is impartial and there is no incentive for the IFA to recommend a product solution.
• Combination: It is also possible to pay a combination of fees and commission. In this situation the IFA will rebate a proportion of the commission they would have been due in a commission-only scenario.

Qualifications

To offer financial advice an individual must represent or be an appointed representative of a firm registered with the Financial Services Authority (FSA). The FSA require that firms ensure that individuals acting for them have appropriate qualifications. The list of appropriate qualifications is determined by the Financial Services Skills Council at the behest of the FSA.

The qualifications for most firms relate to Chartered Insurance Institute (CII) exams past and present.

The entry level is normally the historic 'Financial Planning Certificate' (FPC), or its successor, the 'Certificate in Financial Planning' (CFP) which includes an additional examination focusing on investment advice and risk. For the payment of a fee to the Personal Finance Society members with this level of qualification may use the CertPFS designation. The exams to achieve this are certificate level as designated by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) each exam is approximately equivalent to a GCSE (five for CFP and three for FPC).

The next level is the historical 'Advanced Financial Planning Certificate' (AFPC) and newer 'Diploma in Financial Planning' (DFP). Again for a fee members of the Personal Finance Society may use the designation DipPFS.

The next level is 'Advanced Diploma in Financial Planning'.

The highest level is 'Certified Financial Planner' (CFP) issued by the Institute of Financial Planning or Chartered Financial Planner status recently introduced by the CII.

If things go wrong

Financial services are heavily regulated in the United Kingdom. While this may in some cases restrict the market and places a heavy burden on financial services professionals, it also makes for one of the safest consumer markets in the world.

If a client buys a financial product on the advice of an IFA which turns out to be unsuitable, they have the right to complain and, if the complaint is upheld, may receive compensation. All regulated financial services companies, including IFAs must have effective internal complaint handling procedures. If a complaint is not dealt with satisfactorily internally, the client has the option of going to the Financial Ombudsman Service, which will conduct an independent investigation and has the power to award compensation if warranted. It should be noted that in a large majority of cases referred to the Ombudsman, it finds that the firm had treated the customer’s complaint fairly.

This does not mean that a client can claim compensation simply because an investment loses money. With all investments, there is an element of risk, the basis for complaint would only be whether or not that level of risk was unsuitable for a particular client based on the information given to the adviser. This is particularly important (and not well-understood in the public consciousness), and especially in relation to the sale of with profits endowments intended to be used to repay an interest only mortgage. A great many people saw strongly reduced investment returns from their endowments due to lower interest rates (and hence investment returns) and subsequently claimed that they had been mis-sold. While the poor performance is regrettable, it in no way constitutes mis-selling in the legal sense unless it can be shown that the endowment was unsuitable for the client's needs at the time it was advised. It is not possible to use retrospective judgements to assess decisions made in good faith in the past either.

Credit: Wikipedia